•  
  •  
 

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc

 
Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is the online companion journal to the Vanderbilt Law Review, designed to advance scholarly discussion. When reexamining a case “en banc” an appellate court operates at its highest level, with all judges present and participating “on the bench.” We chose the name “En Banc” to capture this spirit of focused review and provide a forum for further dialogue where all can be present and participate.

Current Issue: Volume 77, Issue 1 (2024)

PDF

MFW DEFENSE AVAILABLE DESPITE CONTROL STOCKHOLDER’S REFUSAL TO NEGOTIATE WITH CREDIBLE COMPETING BIDDER
Robert S. Reder

PDF

DELAWARE SUPREME COURT EXAMINES INTERPLAY OF SCHNELL “INEQUITABLE PURPOSES” DOCTRINE AND BLASIUS “COMPELLING JUSTIFICATION” STANDARD IN ADDRESSING BOARD INTERFERENCE WITH STOCKHOLDER VOTE
Robert S. Reder and Austria C. Arnold

PDF

CHANCERY COURT DEMONSTRATES WILLINGNESS TO APPLY CONTEXT-SPECIFIC TESTS IN ASSESSING CHALLENGES TO ADVANCE NOTICE BYLAWS
Robert S. Reder and Noah Nance

PDF

Second Amendment Immigration Exceptionalism
Pratheepan Gulasekaram

PDF

A Different Standard for Different Stages: Why Parties Must Be Allowed to “Invoke the Rule” During Oral Depositions
Morgan Scott

PDF

The Power Five: The Making of Newsworthy Deal Teams
Tracey E. George, Mitu Gulati, and Albert H. Yoon

View More