Authors

Amanda Rose

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

The Journal of Corporation Law

Publication Date

2017

ISSN

0360-795X

Page Number

77

Keywords

securities fraud, class actions, certification, Omnicare

Disciplines

Law | Securities Law | Torts

Abstract

Federal securities law defines the materiality of corporate disclosures by reference to the views of a hypothetical reasonable investor. For decades the reasonable investor standard has been a flashpoint for debate with critics complaining of the uncertainty it generates and defenders warning of the under-inclusiveness of bright-line alternatives. This Article attempts to shed fresh light on the issue by considering how the reasonable investor differs from its common law antecedent, the reasonable person of tort law. The differences identified suggest that the reasonable investor standard is more costly than tort laws reasonable person standard - the uncertainty it generates is both greater and more pernicious. But the analysis also reveals promising ways to mitigate these costs while retaining the benefits of the flexible standard.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.