Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Notre Dame Law Review
Publication Date
1999
ISSN
0745-3515
Page Number
245
Keywords
liability for hazardous substances, pollution damages, compensation
Disciplines
Environmental Law | Law
Abstract
This article builds a model of federal constitutional amendments using proposed environmental quality rights amendments as a case study. I argue that environmental quality rights amendments are unworkable and violate the underpinnings of federal constitutional design.
Recommended Citation
J.B. Ruhl,
The Metrics of Constitutional Amendments: And Why Proposed Environmental Quality Amendments Don't Measure Up, 74 Notre Dame Law Review. 245
(1999)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/515