Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Constitutional Commentary
Publication Date
1997
Page Number
27
Disciplines
Law
Abstract
Supreme Court currents are no less treacherous to navigators than are river currents-and, as Michael Paulsen himself has previously pointed out, RFRA shares more than a linguistic resonance with a river.1 Unfortunately, this time Paulsen has let himself be fooled by the prevailing political winds into believing that there will be smooth sailing for his favorite statute despite the swirling eddies ahead. He is altogether too confident of a favorable result. Although I have no wagers, public or private (and I am shocked-shocked!-to find gambling in this establishment) on the outcome of Boeme v. Flores, I want to use my editorial prerogative to take issue with my colleague's predictions. Indeed, he seems to have things exactly backward.
Recommended Citation
Suzanna Sherry,
RFRA-Vote Gambling: Why Paulsen is Wrong, As Usual, 14 Constitutional Commentary. 27
(1997)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/352