Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Water Resources Research

Publication Date

10-1972

ISSN

0043-1397

Page Number

1338

Keywords

benefit-cost guidelines, budgetary constraints, maximum economic advantage

Disciplines

Law | Water Law

Abstract

Conventional benefit-cost guidelines are erroneous, owing to their failure to recognize the realities of policy making. From appropriate consideration of budgetary constraints, the interdependence of projects, and the influence of project selection on future budgets the conclusion is that project selection should not follow crude rules of thumb, such as the order of project benefit-cost ratios. By means of a dynamic Lagrangian multiplier model the maximum economic advantage principle for the political context is derived. This principle implies that an optimal project schedule does not require that all marginal benefit-cost ratios be equal. For example, if a project increases the economic desirability of other projects, its own economic value increases. Moreover, a project increasing future budgetary allocations takes on increased economic desirability, since one of the project benefits equals the sum of the increased budgetary allotments, as weighted by the appropriate budgetary shadow premiums.

Included in

Water Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.