Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Judicature
Publication Date
2006
ISSN
0022-5800
Page Number
58
Keywords
judicial ethics, science and law, admissible evidence, adversary system
Disciplines
Evidence | Law | Rule of Law | Science and Technology Law
Abstract
Judges are deeply divided about the issue of independent research, which goes to the heart of their roles and responsibilities in the legal system. To many judges, doing independent research when confronted with new and unfamiliar material seems the most responsible and natural thing to do. To others, it represents the worst kind of overreaching and a threat to long-cherished adversarial values. But whether one supports the practice or not, one thing is clear. The issue of independent research deserves far greater attention than it has so far from jurists, academics, and practitioners alike.
Recommended Citation
Edward K. Cheng,
Should Judges Do Independent Research on Scientific Issues?, 90 Judicature. 58
(2006)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/149