Document Type
Article
Publication Title
University of Chicago Legal Forum
Publication Date
2019
ISSN
0010-1958
Page Number
37
Keywords
sexual harassment, procedural justice, due process
Disciplines
Law | Law and Gender | Sexuality and the Law
Abstract
In their article Unsexing Pregnancy, David Fontana and Naomi Schoenbaum undertake the important project of disentangling the social aspects of pregnancy from those that relate to a pregnant woman’s body. They argue that the law should stop treating the types of work either parent can do—such as purchasing a car seat, finding a pediatrician, or choosing a daycare—as exclusively the domain of the pregnant woman. The project’s primary aim is to undermine legal rules that assume a gendered division of labor in which men are breadwinners and women are caretakers. But Fontana and Schoenbaum argue their project will also have benefits in terms of equality for expectant LGBTQ parents. To further this project, this Response asks what unsexing pregnancy might look like for different types of pregnant people: (1) pregnant individuals who do not identify as women, (2) expectant couples in which one partner is pregnant, (3) expectant parents engaging a surrogate or pursuing adoption, and (4) pregnant people who rely on networks of family and friends for support and caregiving. It argues that, in each of these contexts, the extension of pregnancy benefits raises a unique set of questions. But across all of these contexts, it will take more than simply making existing pregnancy rules gender neutral to achieve equality.
Recommended Citation
Jessica A. Clarke,
The Rules of #MeToo, 2019 University of Chicago Legal Forum. 37
(2019)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/1277