First Page
325
Abstract
1. ADMIRALTY
A FEDERAL COURT Is NOT COMPELLED To ASSERT ITS ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION WHEN THE LITIGANTS HAVE INSUFFICIENT CONTACTS WITH THE UNITED STATES OR WHEN A GOOD FAITH CLAIM FOR EARNED WAGES IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE
SHIPOWNER GUILTY OF DERELECTION IN ITS NONDELEGABLE DUTY To FURNISH A SEAWORTHY VESSEL HELD NOT ENTITLED TO INDEMNIFICATION
INJUNCTION FOR THE REMOVAL OF A DAMAGED VESSEL CANNOT BE GRANTED IN A DIRECT ADMIRALTY PROCEEDING FOR THAT PURPOSE
SHIPOWNER'S LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO GOODS Is NOT LIMITED UNDER EITHER THE CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT OR THE FIRE STATUTE WHEN OWNER FAILED TO EQUIP THE VESSEL WITH ADEQUATE MEANS FOR FIGHTING FIRE
NEGLIGENT SEAMAN'S FAILURE To PERFORM DUTIES OF HIS EMPLOYMENT BARS RECOVERY OF DAMAGES IN ADMIRALTY
PRIVATE CANAL USED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF INTERSTATE COMMERCE IS SUBJECT TO CONGRESSIONAL REGULATION UNDER RIVERS AND HARBORS ACT
==============================
2. ALIENS
DENIAL TO ADOPTED MINOR ALIENS OF THE PRIVILEGE OF AUTOMATIC CITIZENSHIP ON THE NATURALIZATION or ADOPTIVE PARENTS Is NOT VIOLATIVE OF FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT
DENIAL OF AN EXTENSION OF THE PRIVILEGE OF VOLUNTARY DEPARTURE DURING THE PERIOD OF APPLICATION FOR AN IMMIGRANT VISA FOUND NEITHER CAPRICIOUS NOR ARBITRARY
THE STATE HAS No DUTY TO INFORM AN ALIEN ACcUSED OF A CRIME THAT DEPORTATION MAY BE A CONSEQUENCE OF A PLEA OF GUILTY
AN ALIEN CANNOT BE DENIED EMPLOYMENT MERELY BECAUSE SHE Is NOT A UNITED STATES CITIZEN
AVOIDANCE OR EVASION OF MILITARY SERVICE BY A FORMER PERMANENT RESIDENT ALIEN DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM BOTH UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND ADMISSION AS A PERMANENT RESIDENT ALIEN
THE SECRETARY OF LABOR Is EMPOWERED To DENY PREFERENCE VISAS TO ALIENS WHEN No SHORTAGE OF DOMESTIC WORKERS ExISTS
AN ALIEN WHO Is NEVER LEGALLY RELIEVED OF LIABILITY FOR SERVICE IN THE UNITED STATES MILITARY DOES NOT LOSE HIS ELIGIBILITY FOR CITIZENSHIP IN THE UNITED STATES
NONRESIDENT ALIEN CORPORATION HAS STANDING TO CHALLENGE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
=========================
3. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
THE OATH OF ALLIEGANCE AS A PREREQUISITE TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PASSPORT VIOLATES THE RIGHT To TRAVEL GUARANTEED BY THE FIFTH AMENDMENT
THE UNITED STATES MAY CONSTITUTIONALLY RESTRICT THE IMPORTATION OF ENEMY LITERATURE UNDER THE TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT
CONGRESS MAY EXCLUDE ALIENS WITHOUT INFRINGING THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF CITIZENS WHO WISH TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE FOREIGN NATIONAL
========================
4. CONTRACTS
IN ORDER To PRECLUDE RECOVERY FOR BAGGAGE DAMAGE UNDER THE WARSAW CONVENTION THE AIR CARRIER MUST ADEQUATELY INFORM ITS PASSENGERS OF THE THREE DAY PERIOD DURING WHICH WRITTEN CLAIMS MUST BE FILED
=========================
5. IMPORT-EXPORT
IMPOSITION OF CITY FRANCHISE TAX ON IMPORTED GOODS SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED AFTER ARRIVAL IN THE UNITED STATES HELD NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL
======================
6. JURISDICTION
ICAO COUNCIL HAS JURISDICTION To DECIDE WHETHER PAKISTAN OVERFLIGHTS VIOLATED THE CHICAGO INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION CONVENTION AND THE INTERNATIONAL AIR SERVICES TRANSIT AGREEMENT
THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT AND THE FARM LABOR CONTRACTOR ACT Do NOT PROVIDE PRIVATE RIGHTS OF ACTION
THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA MAY EXERCISE JURISDICTION OVER CRIMINAL OFEENSES COMMITTED IN CHINA BY UNITED STATES MILITARY PERSONNEL UNDER THE STATUS OF FORCES AGREEMENT
FEDERAL COURTS CANNOT GRANT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST PICKETING BY LABOR UNIONS OF FOREIGN VESSELS IN UNITED STATES PORTS
ECONOMIC BENEFITS DERIVED FROM PATENT LICENSING AGREEMENT FOUND SUFFICIENT TO SUBJECT FOREIGN MANUFACTURERS TO FEDERAL COURT JURISDICTION UNDER STATE LONG-ARM STATUTE
FEDERAL COURTS HAVE JURISDICTION OVER FOREIGN CORPORATIONS AND FOREIGN NATIONALS ENTERING THE UNITED STATES FOR THE PURPOSE OF INDUCING PERSONS To INVEST ABROAD
THE MERE ARRIVAL OF DAMAGED GOODS AT A PORT IN ILLINOIS Is NOT A SUFFICIENT BASIS ON WHICH To PREDICATE SUBSTITUTED SERVICE OF PROCESS UNDER THE ILLINOIS NONRESIDENT WATER-CRAFT OPERATORS' ACT
====================
7. TRADE REGULATION
COMITY BETWEEN NATIONS DOES NOT REQUIRE DISMISSAL IN A CASE INVOLVING THE ANTITRUST ACTIVITIES OF A FOREIGN CORPORATION IN THE UNITED STATES
EXPROPRIATION AND DISSOLUTION OF A FOREIGN CORPORATION BY A FOREIGN SOVEREIGN NEITHER DEPRIVES FORMER OWNERS AND FIDUCIARIES OF THE RIGHT To MAKE AN EFFECTIVE ASSIGNMENT OF A REGISTERED UNITED STATES TRADEMARK NOR CANCELS THAT TRADEMARK
Recommended Citation
Journal Staff,
Case Digest,
6 Vanderbilt Law Review
325
(1972)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol6/iss1/14