First Page
343
Abstract
This Article proposes a public enforcement model for the fiduciary duties of corporate directors. Under the dominant model of corporate governance, the principal function of the board of directors is to oversee the conduct of senior corporate officials. When directors fail to provide proper oversight, the consequences can be severe for shareholders, creditors, employees, and society at large. Despite general agreement on the importance of director oversight, courts have yet to develop a coherent doctrine governing director liability for the breach of oversight duties. In Delaware, the dominant state for U.S. corporate law, the courts tout the importance of board oversight in dicta, yet emphasize in holdings that directors cannot be personally liable for oversight failures, absent evidence that they intentionally violated their duties.
Recommended Citation
Renee M. Jones and Michelle Welsh,
Toward a Public Enforcement Model for Directors' Duty of Oversight,
42 Vanderbilt Law Review
343
(2021)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol42/iss2/1