Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Vanderbilt Law Review
Publication Date
2008
Page Number
1825
Keywords
judicial process, decision making, United States Supreme Court, jurisdiction
Disciplines
Jurisprudence | Law | Supreme Court of the United States
Abstract
In this Essay--the first in a series of essays designed to reimagine the Supreme Court--we argue that Congress should authorize the Court to adopt, in whole or part, panel decision making... With respect to the prospect of different Court outcomes, we demonstrate empirically in this Essay that the vast majority of cases decided during the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries--including "Grutter", "Roe", and "Bush v. Gore" --would have come out the same way if the Court had decided them in panels rather than as a full Court.
Recommended Citation
Tracey E. George and Chris Guthrie,
"The Threes": Re-Imagining Supreme Court Decisionmaking, 61 Vanderbilt Law Review. 1825
(2008)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/655