Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Vanderbilt Law Review
Publication Date
2015
ISSN
0042-2533
Page Number
1117
Keywords
product safety, regulation, penalties, risk analysis
Disciplines
Commercial Law | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Law
Abstract
The 2014 GM ignition-switch recall highlighted the inadequacies of the company's safety culture and the shortcomings of regulatory sanctions. The company's inattention to systematic thinking about product safety can be traced to the hostile treatment of corporate risk analyses by the courts. This Article proposes that companies should place a greater value on lives at risk than they have in previous risk analyses and that they should receive legal protections for product risk analyses. Companies' valuations of fatality risks and regulatory penalties have priced lives too low. The guidance provided by the value of a statistical life, which is currently $9.1 million for transportation policies, establishes an appropriate price for lives from the standpoint of corporate safety decisions, regulatory sanctions, and punitive damages. The valuation of defect- related deaths may, however, be even greater than that of preventing fatalities through safety improvements; accordingly, the value of a statistical life may establish a floor, rather than a ceiling, for the appropriate penalties for safety- related defects.
Recommended Citation
W. Kip Viscusi,
Pricing Lives for Corporate and Governmental Risk Decisions, 68 Vanderbilt Law Review. 1117
(2015)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/97