Document Type
Article
Publication Title
University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal
Publication Date
2005
ISSN
1710-6028
Page Number
315
Keywords
copyright, Canada Supreme Court, collective management
Disciplines
Intellectual Property Law | International Law | Internet Law | Law
Abstract
IN THREE RECENT CASES, the Supreme Court of Canada provided several pieces of the Canadian copyright policy puzzle. We now know that the economic purpose of copyright law is instrumentalist in nature, namely, to ensure the orderly production and distribution of, and access to, works of art and intellect. The Court added that copyright can not enter carelessly into the private sphere of individual users. By targeting end-users in recent lawsuits, copyright holders have also found out that it is difficult to enforce a right that has not been properly internalized. After reviewing the Supreme Court trilogy of cases, the paper explores the importance of the moral imperative and the almost nonexistent role of Parliament in setting policy at the macro level. In Part 3, the paper proposes two concrete ways to align copyright law with its underlying purpose, especially on the internet. The first is to make existing rights easier to manage by facilitating collective management using the Extended Repertoire (or extended collective licensing system). A compatibility analysis with applicable international norms is provided. The second is a recasting of the copyright rights based on the effect of the use made of the work, not its technical nature.
Recommended Citation
Daniel J. Gervais,
The Purpose of Copyright Law in Canada, 2 University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal. 315
(2005)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/838