Vanderbilt Law Review

First Page



It is no surprise that the press, in exercising its traditional first amendment freedom, often discloses truthful information about individuals that those individuals would prefer to keep private. An inevitable tension exists between the public's right to know and the individual's right to be let alone.' What is surprising, however, especially given the historic recognition of both a free press and individual

privacy as rights fundamental to the preservation of American society,

is that the privacy interests of the individual almost always lose.

The prevalent rationale for this lopsided result is that the first

amendment protects the values promoted by press freedom and that

any infringement of these values consequently warrants the strictest

scrutiny by the courts. The values promoted by privacy, on the other

hand, are general liberty interests within the fifth and fourteenth

amendments that, when threatened, deserve only due process balancing.' Some legal scholars, therefore, have claimed that the public disclosure tort,' which gives individuals a cause of action against a publisher

of embarrassing private facts of no legitimate public interest, is facially

invalid. Nevertheless, recent Supreme Court decisions reflect, and most

as it consists in preventing publication, is merely an instance of the enforcement of the more general right of the individual to be let alone."

Included in

Law Commons