Article Title
First Page
1043
Abstract
Under the existing statute Congress has attempted by legislation to encourage the development of HMOs as a viable alternative for the health-care consumer. As is often the casein the political world of Congress, the fanfare accompanying a legislative response has obscured the deficiencies of the answer. This act with its limited appropriations, restricted preemption language,and failure to support profit-making HMOs constitutes an experimental approach to the HMO concept, and therefore, only illusionary support for its development.
Recommended Citation
Mark J. Mathiesen,
Recent Developments,
27 Vanderbilt Law Review
1043
(1974)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol27/iss5/4