Civil Rights--Private Education-Racially Discriminatory Admissions Policies Violate Right to Contract Provision of 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiffs, ' blacks who had been denied admission solely on the basis of their race to two all-white private schools that received no state aid,' sought damages and injunctive relief in federal district court contending that these rejections violated section 1981 of 42 U.S.C. by denying them the same right to contract as enjoyed by white citizens.
Copyright--Telecommunications--CATV Importation of Distant Television Signals Constitutes Infringement Under Sections One (c) & (d) of the Copyright Act
Plaintiffs,' creators and producers of television programs,brought a copyright infringement action against defendants, owners and operators of Community Antenna Television (CATV) systems. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants' five CATV systems, by intercepting the signals of local and distant' television stations that were broadcasting plaintiff's copyrighted works and then channeling those programs to defendants' subscribers, had performed plaintiff's works within the meaning of sections one (c) and (d) of the Copyright Act of 1909.
Criminal Law--Right to Counsel--Sixth Amendment Does Not Grant Accused the Right to Counsel at Pretrial Photographic Display
Respondent, convicted in federal district court of bank robbery,' appealed his conviction alleging denial of his sixth amendment right to counsel. Prior to trial, and to ensure positive in-court identification, the prosecution had conducted a photographic display during which its witnesses identified respondent as a participant in the robbery, and at which neither respondent nor his counsel were present. The trial judge admitted this post-indictment photographic identification into evidence in addition to the witnesses'courtroom identification of respondent.' Respondent contended on appeal that the post-indictment photographic display was a critical stage in the prosecution at which the presence of counsel was required by the sixth amendment. The prosecution argued that a photographic identification session which the accused does not attend cannot give rise to a right to counsel. The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit adopted respondent's position and reversed.
Labor Law--Strikes-Union Has Implied Obligation Under No-Strike Clause to Use Every Reasonable Means to End Wildcat Strike
Pursuant to section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act,' plaintiff employers brought an action against defendant local and international unions for damages resulting from "wildcat strikes." Plaintiffs alleged that defendants' failure to use every reasonable means to end the strikes constituted a breach of no-strike provisions' in their collective bargaining agreements. Defendants asserted that a provision of the agreement stating that the Union would not be liable for any "unauthorized acts" of members expressly precluded union liability for such unauthorized strikes.' The federal district court held, judgment for plaintiffs.
Securities Regulation-Inside Information-Tippees Accountable at Common Law to Corporation for Profits Gained by Use of Inside Information
Plaintiffs, corporate stockholders of Lum's, Inc., brought a derivative action against an investment firm, its stockbroker, and two mutual funds,' claiming profits that defendant mutual funds had realized upon their timely sale of stock in the corporation before the stock declined in price. Defendants had made the sale after receiving confidential information in the form of a "tip" by the corporation's president. Although the corporation suffered no alleged specific damages from the sale, plaintiffs contended that defendant's use of confidential information received while engaged in a common enterprise with an insider violated a state common law fiduciary duty' owed to the corporation.
Vanderbilt Law Review staff,
26 Vanderbilt Law Review
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol26/iss6/8