Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Journal of Dispute Resolution
Publication Date
2002
ISSN
1052-2859
Page Number
127
Keywords
mediation, dispute resolution; trial, arbitration and settlement
Disciplines
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Law | Litigation
Abstract
Professor Deborah Hensler tells an important cautionary tale about mandatory mediation in her thoughtful and provocative contribution to this volume. In Suppose It's Not True: Challenging Mediation Ideology, Hensler observes that courts are now requiring litigants to mediate civil cases "on the grounds that litigants prefer [mediation] to traditional litigation," yet there is "a long line of social psychological research on individuals' evaluations of different dispute resolution procedures" consistent with the "idea that litigants might prefer adversarial litigation and adjudication" to mediation.' Hensler acknowledges that "some experimental research has found that subjects prefer mediation," but she argues that "the empirical work to date [does not] provide strong support for the notion that civil disputants prefer mediation to adversarial litigation and adjudication."
Recommended Citation
Chris Guthrie,
Procedural Justice Research and the Paucity of Trials, 2002 Journal of Dispute Resolution. 127
(2002)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/706