Stanford Law Review
Last April, Professors Daniel Farber and Suzanna Sherry published a critique in these pages of the legal storytelling movement. Their legal position has been the subject of several responses, including an essay by Professor William Eskridge in this issue. In reply, Professors Farber and Sherry challenge their critics' reliance on postmodern views such as social constructionism. Social constructionism, according to Farber and Sherry, embraces forms of community that would be destructive to the scholarly enterprise. It also risks conflating scholarship with politics in ways harmful to both. More generally, Farber and Sherry contend, postmodernism lacks any clear lessons for legal scholarship and possesses at best a contingent connection with progressive change.
Suzanna Sherry and Daniel A. Farber,
The 200,000 Cards of Dimitri Yurasov: Further Reflections on Scholarship and Truth, 46 Stanford Law Review. 647
Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/359